Charting the Course of Teaching and Learning in a Networked World
.
.
It seems these days that we are watching the government regulators crack down on Wall Street with the new Financial Reform Law, and their theory is that they will now have the power to enforce regulations and prevent another global economic meltdown or disintegration of the US economy plunging us into a near depression rather than our "shallowed-out" business-cycle recessions. Is that possible? No, and let me tell you why.
.
Consider if you will after the big S and L Crash many years back, junk bond challenges, Enron fiasco, or the mortgage crisis. If you will recall each time more regulations were put into place, did they stop the next round of nonsense? NO. After Enron we watched one of the largest Accounting Firms crash and burn, remember Arthur Anderson, and then we ended up with new accounting standards and Sarbanes-Oxley, but did that stop the next crisis? NO.
.
Now we have a new Financial Regulatory Reform Bill, after the mortgage meltdown, which crashed Wall Street and the Global Economy. And with fire in their veins we have regulators and the Department of Justice looking for heads to roll, why? To show they are doing something of course, and bring back consumer and investor, small business, and foreign institutional investment confidence. Will it work? Yes, it might bring back confidence at first, but the law of unintended consequences will make it worse.
.
Now then, let's switch gears and talk a little about regulation in our great nation, let's talk about the truth, the façade, and the incestuous relationship between law-makers, corporations, banks, and those who perhaps really do need regulation but are essentially assured of not get any. Only their competitors will be regulated in the future, as those bigger culprits and their lobbyists did most of the work on forging these new regulations and making things best for them and their way of doing business, while creating barriers to entry for the rest of the industry.
.
Not long ago, I talked to a self-proclaimed expert in "Fair Value Accounting" which is his profession, and then we got to talking about education and costs, and the recent regulatory attacks on Private Corporation Style Colleges such as; Kaplan, Apollo Group, Corinthian Colleges, University of Phoenix, DeVry, Capella Education, and Career Education, as per a Wall Street Journal article on August 17, 2010 entitled "For Profit Schools Fret Over Repayment Test – Department of Education Report Gives Bad Grades to Some Institutions and Its Proposed Regulations Could Crimp Their Aid – and Profits," which was written by Melissa Korn.
.
My acquaintance actually had an MBA from a Private for-profit college, and this has helped his career, but it wasn't cheap, and he'll be paying that off for a while he indicated. He believes that the governments attacks on for-profit company colleges and learning institutions is justified and I believe it's not. And do not believe that the US regulators are being fair, otherwise they'd shut down half of the colleges and Universities in our nation.
.
Are some for-profit private company colleges underperforming, perhaps, but it certainly couldn't be any worse than our overall education system; K-12 and colleges and so, some, I agree, but not all, and the Universities do it too as they promise all their students; "We place 90% of our graduating class with the top fortune 500 companies!" and then the students go into hock on the student loans etc, but when the economy took a hit, all bets were off, regardless of where the kids went to school, maybe with the exception of Harvard, Yale, MIT, Stanford, Wharton, etc. they may have had a better chance, but there are plenty of horror stories there too, law students unable to get work, with an Ivy League law degree? The success ticked of a lifetime, or so it's been said.
.
There was a great article recently in the news on this topic, I recommend you look it up and read it; "What they Are Doing After Harvard," which was an interview with Wendy Kopp by Naomi Schaefer Riley in the Wall Street Journal. And that very same day was another article in the "Economic Times of India," entitled; "Harvard is a Waste of Money!" Apparently, to attack the for-profit education sector is a little insincere of our regulators, and so, that I guess is another side of the argument, and the cost Holy Toledo, that could take a while to pay off.
.
And with public or private colleges and Universities there is that big issue of competition, so we know they don't like competition, they like monopolies such as the text book scheme they got going where you pay $250 for a text book that you need for the class. I recommend that you read; "Textbooks Up Their Game," an article by Jeffrey A. Trachenberg which also appeared in the WSJ. Maybe the Universities should also stop complaining about the eBook reader textbooks cramping their style, while they reconsider their dismal performance before encouraging the regulators to attack for-profit corporations who are picking up their slack in the marketplace?
.
You see, the attacking of for-profit college companies is inexcusable and pathetic, it's just regulators attempting to show they are doing something, but are they really going to make colleges guarantee jobs for those who graduate in the market place, or come up with some baloney fair-value assessment of what a college education is worth? I mean we still have Universities claiming that those who graduate will earn over 1.5 million dollars more in their lifetime, and yet, those studies have never been peer-reviewed to the point the regulators are asking private company colleges to do now.
.
And how many of those colleges can claim that 90% of their graduates in 2008, 2009, 2010, or 2011 went to work for the top 500 companies in America or that those students will make 1.5 million more over their lifetime earnings? And if someone is smart enough to jump through all those hurdles, hell, they'd have been successful in whatever they did anyway, they hardly needed college to make them successful in life. It's a big façade, and the truth is Universities will become less relevant as time goes on, if they don't radically change the way they do things. So, why is the justice department protecting an old dinosaur?
.
It's all about Politics my friends!
.
.
What Say You about All This?
.
What is the true fair-value of an education, and what is the market-to-market value on that, quick, quick give us the answer, we command you?!?
.
.
References:
------ ------- -----
Note: the author of this quick article has read over 400 research papers, and 50 books on education over the last 5-years alone, and has also obviously experienced the public school system k-12 and college, as well as for-profit education.
.
By Lance Winslow
.
Views: 8
Tags: assessment, by-lance-winslow, college, education, fair-value, lance, private, winslow
Comment
"Steve conducted the most in-depth interview I've ever been through and I enjoyed it to boot!"
-Doc Searls
FutureofEducation.com is a free series. You can support the site by making a donation (any amount):
© 2012 Created by Steve Hargadon.
Powered by
You need to be a member of The Future of Education to add comments!
Join The Future of Education